There are four lists of the disciples found in Scripture. They sometimes differ in order, but this is not a problem since listing people in a different order still demonstrates that the people were the same. Matthew, Mark, and Luke, each contain a list of 12 disciples. However, Acts contains only 11. This is because Judas Iscariot, who had betrayed Christ, had died and was not listed. Acts 1:21-26 tells how they replaced Judas with Matthias thus retaining 12 disciples.
Month: November 2020
Mark 2:26 – Was Abiathar or Ahimelech the high preist
1 Samuel 21:1, “Then David came to Nob to Ahimelech the priest; and Ahimelech came trembling to meet David and said to him, ‘Why are you alone and no one with you?'”
Mark 2:26, “how he entered the house of God in the time of Abiathar the high priest, and ate the consecrated bread, which is not lawful for anyone to eat except the priests, and he also gave it to those who were with him?”
Mark 2:26 – Was the high priest Abiathar or Ahimelech?
Problem: Jesus claimed that Abiathar was the high priest at the time of Christ. However, 1 Samuel 21:1-6 states that the high priest was actually Ahimelech. Critic Bart Ehrman explained that this “mistake” in the Bible led him to begin doubting the authority and inerrancy of Scripture.[1]
Mark 2:26 – Was Jesus wrong when He mentioned Abiathar as high priest instead of Ahimelech?
Problem: Jesus says that at the time David ate the consecrated bread, Abiathar was high priest. Yet 1 Samuel 21:1–6 mentions that the high priest at that time was Ahimelech.
Mark 2:14 – Was the taxman named Matthew or Levi?
Matthew (Matthew 9:9) – “And as Jesus passed on from there, He saw a man, called Matthew, sitting in the tax office; and He *said to him, “Follow Me!” And he rose, and followed Him.”
Levi (Mark 2:14) – “And as He passed by, He saw Levi the son of Alphaeus sitting in the tax office, and He *said to him, “Follow Me!” And he rose and followed Him.”
Levi (Luke 5:27) – “And after that He went out, and noticed a tax-gatherer named Levi, sitting in the tax office, and He said to him, “Follow Me.”
Mark 1:40-42 – Was Jesus breaking the law in touching a leper?
Problem: Jesus healed a leper by touching him. However, the Hebrew law stated that it is wrong to touch lepers. Leviticus 5:3 states, “If he touches human uncleanness, of whatever sort his uncleanness may be with which he becomes unclean, and it is hidden from him, and then he comes to know it, he will be guilty.” Did Jesus commit a sin by touching the leper?
Mark 1:9 – Why was Jesus baptized?
Problem: Jesus was baptized, but normally, only sinners were baptized by John. Why was Jesus baptized? Was he secretly sinful and needed to repent of this before he could start his ministry?
Mark 1:7-13 – What did Jesus do after encountering John the Baptist?
After His baptism, Jesus spent some time with the disciples and then went into the desert. John the Apostle’s account of the baptism of Jesus is not a focus on chronological events. Instead, it is focusing on the ministerial aspect of Christ’s mission. John focuses on the issue of baptism and the commission of Christ and the blessing of the Father. Mark simply states that Jesus went into the wilderness after His baptism. Each account is about the same thing, but each addresses the issue in a very different manner and extracts different information from the events. Mark is succinct and mentions events several more events than John. There is no contradiction because there is no conflict in what is said.
Mark 1:2 – Why does Mark cite Malachi 3:1 and Isaiah 40:3?
Problem: Mark cites from Malachi 3:1 and Isaiah 40:3. Why does he do this?
Mark 1:2 – How can Mark’s misquotation of this OT prophecy be justified?
Problem: Mark misquotes Malachi, as indicated by the italicized words:
As it is written in the prophets, Behold, I send my messenger before thy face, which shall prepare thy way before thee. (Mark 1:2)
Mark 1:1 – Why does Mark omit giving any genealogy of Jesus like Matthew and Luke do?
Problem: Both Matthew (chap. 1) and Luke (chap. 3) give an ancestry of Jesus (see Matt. 1:1). However, Mark provides no genealogy whatsoever. Why the omission?
Matthew 28:18–20 – How can three persons be God when there is only one God?
Problem: Matthew speaks of the “Father, Son, and Holy Spirit” all being part of one “name.” But these are three distinct persons. How can there be three persons in the Godhead when there is only “one God” (Deut 6:4; 1 Cor. 8:6)?
Matthew 28:9 – Who saw Jesus first?
The first one to see Jesus after His resurrection was Mary Magdalene just as it says (Mark 16:9).
Matthew 28:9 – To whom did Christ appear first, the women or His disciples?
Problem: Both Matthew and Mark list women as the first ones to see the resurrected Christ. Mark says, “He appeared first to Mary Magdalene” (16:9). But Paul lists Peter (Cephas) as the first one to see Christ after His resurrection (1 Cor. 15:5).
Solution: Jesus appeared first to Mary Magdalene, then to the other women, and then to Peter. The order of the twelve appearances of Christ goes as follows:
THE ORDER OF THE TWELVE APPEARANCES OF CHRIST
Paul was not giving a complete list, but only the important one for his purpose. Since only men’s testimony was considered legal or official in the 1st century, it is understandable that the apostle would not list the women in his defense of the resurrection here.
Matthew 28:8 – Did or did not the women tell what happened?
They told what happened (Matthew 28:8) – “And they departed quickly from the tomb with fear and great joy and ran to report it to His disciples.”
