petra1000

I am a born again christian who loves the Lord and I am taking bible classes online
I am a born again christian who loves the Lord and I am taking bible classes online

Acupuncture

3 John 2 Beloved, I wish above all things that thou mayest prosper and be in health, even as thy soul prospereth.

(The following are excerpts from an article by James K. Walker entitled “Acupuncture”)

By most estimates the practice of some forms of acupuncture can be dated over 5,000 years ago.

Continue reading →

Posted by petra1000 in Apologetics

Leviticus 18:22–24—Is the curse of barrenness the reason God condemned homosexuality?

Problem: According to Jewish belief, barrenness was a curse (Gen. 16:1; 1 Sam. 1:3–7). Children were considered a blessing from the Lord (Ps. 127:3). The blessing of God in the land was dependent on having children (Gen. 15:5). In view of the stress laid on having children, some have argued that it is not surprising that the OT Law would frown on homosexual activity from which no children come. Thus, they conclude that the Bible is not condemning homosexual activity as such, but only the refusal to have children.

Continue reading →

Posted by petra1000 in Bible Difficulty

Abortion

Jane Roe, aka Norma McCorvey, was 21 when the case was filed (Roe v. Wade) and was on her third pregnancy, and actually never had an abortion; she gave birth to a girl, who was given up for adoption.

In a book she wrote, “I am Roe”, McCorvey, a ninth-grade dropout, describes a tough life, explaining that she suffered physical and emotional abuse as a child, spent some time in reform school in Gainesville, Texas, and was raped as a teen-ager. She was later beaten by a husband whom she married at age 16. She also tells of her alcohol and drug abuse, and experiences with lovers of both sexes.

Continue reading →

Posted by petra1000 in Apologetics

Historical Evidence for Jesus

A few of the more radical skeptics deny that Jesus was an historical person. This is called “the Jesus myth.” In 2012, for example, Timothy Freke published The Jesus Mysteries: Was the ‘Original Jesus’ a Pagan God?

Following is a refutation of the myth of the Jesus myth:

  1. The historicity of Jesus was not disputed until recent times.

Had there been any question whatsoever about the actual existence of Jesus, the opponents of Christianity in the early centuries would have used this to refute Christianity’s legitimacy, but this was never done.

Continue reading →

Posted by petra1000 in Bible Proof, History, Jesus

Introduction to Apologetics (Part 2)

(The following is taken from the Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics, by Norman L. Geisler)

There are differing kinds of apologetics systems, and no universally-acknowledged way to categorize them. Divergent approaches seem to be determined by the perspective of the one categorizing them. Nonetheless, there are some generally understood terms one can employ to view in a meaningful way the distinctives among more popular approaches.

Continue reading →

Posted by petra1000 in Apologetics

Introduction to Apologetics (Part 1)

Apologetics is the discipline that deals with a rational defense of Christian faith. It comes from the Greek word apologia which means to give a reason or defense.
The most important reason to [be involved in] apologetics is that God told us to do so. The classic statement is 1 Peter 3:15, which says, “But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear:”
This verse tells us to be ready. We may never run across someone who asks tough questions about our faith, but we should still be ready to respond if someone does. Being ready is not just a matter of having the right information available, it is also an attitude of readiness and eagerness to share the truth of what we believe. We are to give a reason to those who ask the questions. It is not expected that everyone needs pre-evangelism, but when they do need it, we must be able and willing to give them an answer.

Continue reading →

Posted by petra1000 in Apologetics

Leviticus 18:22—Have the laws against homosexuality been abolished along with laws against eating pork?

Problem: The law against homosexuality is found in the levitical law (Lev. 18:22) along with laws against eating pork and shrimp (Lev. 11:2–3, 10). But these ceremonial laws have been done away with (Acts 10:15). This being the case, some insist that the laws prohibiting homosexual activity are no longer binding either.

Continue reading →

Posted by petra1000 in Bible Difficulty

Leviticus 16:6–22—Why did God set up the procedure of the scapegoat, and what does it represent?

Problem: Leviticus 16 sets up the procedure for the Day of Atonement of killing one goat as a sin offering to make atonement for the Holy Place, and then confessing the sins of Israel upon the head of another goat and sending it away into the wilderness. However, this does not present a unified picture, for there is only one sacrifice for our sins, not two (Heb. 10:14).

Continue reading →

Posted by petra1000 in Bible Difficulty

Keys to Prayer

If two of you shall agree on earth as touching any thing that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of my Father which is in heaven. (Matthew 18:19)

Continue reading →

Posted by petra1000 in Prayer

Leviticus 12:5, 7—If motherhood was so blessed by God, why did mothers have to bring a sacrifice to God to expiate for having children?

Problem: The Bible exalts the position of motherhood saying, “Your wife shall be like a fruitful vine … your children like olive plants” (Ps. 128:3). Nevertheless, mothers were commanded to bring a sacrifice to the altar for “purification” and “atonement” after the birth of a child (Lev. 12:5–7).

Continue reading →

Posted by petra1000 in Bible Difficulty

Leviticus 11:5–6—How can the Bible say that the hyrax and the rabbit chew the cud when science now knows that they do not?

Problem: In Leviticus 11:5–6, two animals, the rock hyrax and the rabbit, were designated as unclean by Leviticus because, although they chew the cud, they do not divide the hoof. But, science has discovered that these two animals do not chew the cud. Isn’t it an error when the Bible says they chew the cud when in fact they do not?

Continue reading →

Posted by petra1000