Problem: Jesus said, “Unless you are converted and become like children, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven” (Mt. 18:3). Does this mean that believers should be naïve and gullible?
Matthew 17: 1 – After how many days did Jesus take the three men up the mountain?
Problem: Was It Six or Eight Days?
Six Days later (Matthew 17:1) – “And six days later Jesus *took with Him Peter and James and John his brother, and *brought them up to a high mountain by themselves.”
(Mark 9:2) – “And six days later, Jesus *took with Him Peter and James and John, and *brought them up to a high mountain by themselves. And He was transfigured before them;”
Eight Days later (Luke 9:28-29) – “And some eight days after these sayings, it came about that He took along Peter and John and James, and went up to the mountain to pray. And while He was praying, the appearance of His face became different, and His clothing became white and gleaming.”
Matthew 16:28 – Did Jesus make a false prediction about his second coming?
Problem: Jesus said, “Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom” (Mt. 16:28). Preterists claim that this passage affirms that Jesus’ second coming will occur before his disciples die. For instance, Preterist Gary DeMar writes,
“If we maintain that the event Jesus is describing in these verses is still in our future, then how should we interpret Jesus’ statement that some of those with whom He was speaking would still be alive when He did in fact “come in the glory of His Father with His angels”? Some claim that the “coming” Jesus had in mind was the Transfiguration. But the Transfiguration cannot be its fulfillment since Jesus indicated that some who were standing with Him would still be alive when He came but most would be dead. If we adopt the view that the Transfiguration is the fulfillment of Matthew 16:27–28, we must conclude that most of the people with whom Jesus spoke were dead within seven to ten days (Matthew 17:1)! Hardly possible.[1]
Is this the case?”
Matthew 16:28 – Did Jesus make a mistake about His disciples seeing the kingdom come in their lifetimes?
Problem: Jesus told His disciples that some of them would not see death until they saw Him coming in His kingdom. Yet during the life of the apostles, Jesus never returned to set up His kingdom.
Matthew 16:20 – Why did Jesus instruct His disciples to tell no one He was the Christ?
Problem: Jesus commissioned His disciples, “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations” (Matt. 28:19). Yet over and over again throughout His ministry He insisted that His followers “tell no man” (cf. Matt. 8:4; 16:20; 17:9; Mark 7:36; 8:30; 9:9; Luke 5:14; 8:56; 9:21). Doesn’t this contradict His Great Commission?
Matthew 16:19 – What does binding and loosing mean?
Problem: Jesus said, “I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; and whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven” (Mt. 16:19). What did he mean by this?
Matthew 16:18 – Did Jesus give papal authority to Peter?
Problem: Jesus tells Peter, “I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; and whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven” (Mt. 16:18-19). Roman Catholic scholars argue that this passage refers to Christ giving Peter papal infallibility. Is this the case?
Matthew 16:18—Is Peter the rock on which the church is built?
Problem: Roman Catholics use this passage to support their belief in the primacy of Peter, that is, that he is the rock on which the church is built. But Paul said the church is built on Christ, not Peter (1 Cor. 3:11). Is Peter the “rock” in this passage?
Matthew 16:16 – Why does Peter’s confession here differ from that recorded in Mark and Luke?
Problem: Peter’s confession of Christ in Caesarea Philippi is stated differently in the three Gospels:
Matthew: “And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.”
Mark: “You are the Christ” (8:29).
Luke: “The Christ of God” (9:20).
If the Bible is the inspired Word of God, why are there three different reports of what Peter said? What did he really say?
Matthew 15:22-28 – Was Jesus cruel to this Canaanite woman?
Problem: When a Canaanite woman came to Jesus pleading for help, he told her that he “was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Mt. 15:24). When she persisted, he said, “It is not good to take the children’s bread and throw it to the dogs” (v.26). He eventually healed her daughter, but why did he call her and her daughter “dogs”?
Matthew 14:4 – Why was is “not lawful” for Herod to marry Herodias?
Problem: Originally, Herod was married to the daughter of an Arabian King (Aretus). They probably had a peace treaty, because Aretus’ land bordered on Israel. However, Herod wanted to divorce his wife to marry Herodias. John repeatedly said that this was not lawful. The imperfect elegen means “repeatedly.” Thus Matthew 14:4 should be rendered, “For John had been repeatedly saying to him.” But why?
Matthew 13:58 – Could Jesus not perform miracles?
Problem: Matthew writes, “He did not do many miracles there because of their unbelief” (Mt. 13:58). Did Jesus need people to believe in him in order for him to perform miracles?
Matthew 13:56 – Was Mary a perpetual virgin, or did she have other children after Jesus’ virgin birth?
Problem: Roman Catholicism teaches that Mary was a perpetual virgin, that is, that she never had sexual intercourse, even after Jesus was virgin born. Is it true that when the Bible refers to Jesus’ “brothers and sisters” (Matt. 13:56) it means cousins or close relatives?
Matthew 13:55 – Did Jesus have brothers, or was Mary a perpetual virgin as Roman Catholicism claims?
Problem: Evangelicals and Catholics agree that Mary was a virgin before she gave birth to Jesus (Mt. 1:23), but what about after? The Catholic Catechism (1994) states,
The deepening of faith in the virginal motherhood led the Church to confess Mary’s real and perpetual virginity even in the act of giving birth to the Son of God made man. In fact, Christ’s birth “did not diminish his mother’s virginal integrity but sanctified it.” And so the liturgy of the Church celebrates Mary as Aeiparthenos, the “Ever–virgin.”[1]
Matthew 13:54-58 – How was Jesus rejected?
Problem: There are differences in Jesus’ rejection between the Synoptic gospels. Matthew and Mark place this event in the middle of Jesus’ ministry, but Luke places it at the beginning. Moreover, Matthew and Mark state that Jesus left quietly (Mt. 13:58; Mk. 6:5), while Luke explains he was chased by a mob (Lk. 4:30). What should we make of these? Are they contradictions?
