Problem: According to Luke, the apostles were told to “tarry in the city of Jerusalem” until Pentecost. But Matthew tells us that they went into Galilee (Matt. 28:10, 16).
Luke 24:34 – Was Jesus invisible to mortal eyes before and after He appeared?
Problem: The phrase “He appeared” means “He made Himself visible” to them (cf. 1 Cor. 15:5–8). Jesus also disappeared (Luke 24:31). Some take this to mean that Jesus was not essentially material, but simply materialized when He appeared to His disciples and dematerialized when He disappeared. However, other passages declare that Jesus had the same continuously material body of flesh and bones in which He died (Luke 24:39; John 20:27).
Luke 24:31b – If Jesus had the same physical body after His resurrection, why did His disciples not recognize Him?
Problem: These two disciples walked with Jesus, talked with Him, and ate with Him and still did not recognize Him. Other disciples had the same experience (see verses below). If He rose in the same physical body (cf. Luke 24:39; John 20:27), then why didn’t they recognize Him.
Luke 24:31a – Did Jesus dematerialize when He suddenly disappeared from the disciples after an appearance?
Problem: Jesus could not only suddenly appear after His resurrection (cf. John 20:19), but He could also instantly disappear. Is this evidence, as some critics claim, that Jesus dematerialized on these occasions?
Luke 24:23 – Were Jesus’ resurrection appearances physical or mere visions?
Problem: Jesus spoke of His resurrection body having “flesh and bones” (Luke 24:39). He ate physical food (v. 42) and was touched by human hands (Matt. 28:9). But Luke calls it a “vision” in this passage, which implies that it was not a real physical appearance. In addition, some point to the fact that those who were with Paul during his Damascus road experience did not see Christ (see Acts 9:7).
Luke 24:15-18 – Who saw Jesus first after His resurrection?
The first one to see Jesus after His resurrection was Mary Magdalene just as it says (Mark 16:9).
Luke 24:10 – Do the Gospels disagree on who discovered the empty tomb?
Critics of the New Testament often suggest that the gospels present contradictory narratives regarding Jesus‘ resurrection. One such argument (which is honestly rather weak but comes up surprisingly often) involves the detail of who it was that discovered Jesus’ empty tomb. The claim is that each gospel lists a different set of women and that the story, therefo re, cannot be trusted. This argument, however, breaks down almost immediately on even the slightest examination. The truth is that, while each of the four gospels includes unique details on the matter, they all are perfectly consistent with one another on who it was who first found the stone rolled away and the body of Jesus missing. The gospels are definitely in agreement on this.
Luke 24:9 – Did or did not the women tell what happened at the tomb?
Did or did not the women tell what happened at the tomb and the resurrection of Jesus? Continue reading →
Luke 24:5-7 – What did the angels tell Mary at the empty tomb?
When Jesus‘ empty tomb was discovered, the gospels all agree that an angelic message was delivered to a woman named Mary. Exactly what the angel’s words were, however, differs between the gospels. Is this a contradiction? Let’s take a look:
Luke 24:4 – How many men or angels appeared at the tomb?
How many men or angels appeared at the tomb after Jesus rose from the dead?